Learn how manufacturing planning can seamlessly re-use 3D engineering CAD model data for detailed planning and validation (eBOM to mBOM to process planning).
One of my roles is to help manufacturing companies optimize their assembly process. Over the years, I have met and discussed this challenge with many, many customers, making a broad range of products, from medical to automotive to aerospace. Sure, there are industry and company specific issues but by and large, companies that design and manufacture complex products share very similar needs regarding optimizing their assembly processes.
In summary, the issue is how to effectively use 3D engineering CAD data downstream to plan and optimize; and to start as early as possibly without losing work when engineering changes occur.
Companies have invested heavily in their 3D CAD system/s for their product development. The problem is that CAD is for product development. CAD systems are compute resource intensive, require extensive knowledge to operate, and licenses are expensive. Moreover, most importantly they are designed to be used by product designers and engineers
How to effectively leverage the engineering data to downstream functions? This is the fundamental question and is the focus of this article.
Product Design
Let’s start with the design team. A complex product may have hundreds or even thousands of parts. The design, of course, will be split into subassemblies. Moreover, each subassembly can also have more subassemblies. This may continue to more and more layers. This organization of the product will usually be directly related to how the design team decides to accomplish their design and often time relates to how the team is organized. This results in the eBOM and is the design view.
Manufacturing Planning
When it comes to designing the manufacturing process, manufacturing engineers need the flexibility to use the engineering data (eBOM) but make it their own. In other words, they need to start with the eBOM but have the flexibility to rearrange it according to their manufacturing planning view. They have little interest in how the product was organized from the design perspective; it just doesn’t matter.
Manufacturing is much more concerned about the tasks needed to go from start to finish and their logical order. And of course, manufacturing has additional information that needs to be included for planning the manufacturing process.
For instance:
Moreover, we all know, the only certainty in the future is uncertainty. This certainly holds true with product changes. Which introduces another problem, how to keep the mBOM in-sync with the eBOM when engineering change orders (ECOs) occur.
Courtesy of Toyota Motor Corporation
For a designer, it may be fine to see only their subassembly and the related parts/subassemblies – however, for manufacturing planning, it is much better for them to view the entire product. This enables comprehensive planning from different perspectives such as parts to be purchased vs. fabricated to assembly order. For many companies, this is not possible using their CAD system due to application/compute restrictions. Loading an assembly with thousands of parts in any CAD system is usually problematic. Load times can be very long, and the interactive 3D performance can be very, very slow.
Recap Of Issues
What Capabilities do Manufacturing Planners Need?
Easy & free access to anyone who needs to consume the information in 2D or interactive 3D on a variety of devices.
Lattice Technology lets you optimize your assembly process by creating a virtual assembly model for planning your manufacturing processes—while the product is still in design. Using our software, you can seamlessly incorporate part and assembly models from all major 3D CAD systems. The Lattice software takes the heavy 3D data and creates accurate and ultra-lightweight models, which allows production engineers to easily work with the virtual assembly model. An easy-to-use interface tool allows users to share the virtual assembly model, and best of all, you do not need CAD expertise to use the software.
Toyota Example
The Toyota Motor Company was originally a customer, and now they are a majority stakeholder. Using XVL, they can perform complete manufacturing assembly planning and validation using a complete automobile with its thousands of parts in a single instance.
Courtesy Toyota Motor Corporation
If you would like to learn more, download this case study on the topic which features the Toyota Motor Corporation and shipbuilder Tsuneishi.